anklman
Case File · Hindfoot · Diabetic / limb salvage
Case Number
006
De-identified · Teaching Use

Charcot hindfoot collapse — tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with a retrograde nail

A 58-year-old plumber with long-standing type 2 diabetes and a three-month history of progressive hindfoot collapse. Unstable rocker-bottom deformity, threatening ulceration at the lateral malleolus, non-infected. Limb salvage with TTC fusion.

Patient Registry01 Presentation

Patient

Age

58

Sex

M

Occupation

Residential plumber, still working full time

Relevant history

Type 2 diabetes for 22 years, A1c 7.9 on presentation. Peripheral neuropathy documented on monofilament testing. No peripheral vascular disease on noninvasive studies. Progressive hindfoot deformity over three months with an insidious onset, no known trauma. Pre-ulcer at the lateral malleolus but no open wound or infection.

Imaging02 Studies · 8 plates

Pre-op, intra-op, post-op.

01 · Pre-operative4 plates
02 · Intra-operative2 plates
03 · Post-operative2 plates
Clinical Reasoning03 Decision · 04 Technique

Clinical reasoning

The clinical question

Charcot neuroarthropathy in a non-infected but threatening hindfoot. The patient has an unstable rocker-bottom deformity with a pre-ulcerous lateral malleolus and deformity progressing fast enough that a bracing strategy is not going to hold. The question is not whether to operate — the limb is threatened. The question is what operation gives us the best chance at a stable, plantigrade, brace-able limb that he can continue to work on.

Imaging

The radiographs told the story on presentation — loss of talar height, calcaneal pitch near zero, and midfoot collapse. CT gave us the bone-quality read: fragmented talar body, disorganized tibiotalar and subtalar joints, and an intact enough calcaneus to accept a nail. MRI was obtained to rule out osteomyelitis before we committed to a large internal fixation construct. Edema pattern without discrete abscess.

The decision

Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with a retrograde intramedullary nail, transfibular approach, structural allograft to the tibiotalar void. The alternatives considered — isolated ankle fusion with a separate subtalar fusion, or a plate-and-screw construct — were not adequate given the extent of his neuropathic destruction. The retrograde nail gives us the strongest construct available for a Charcot patient who will not follow a strict non-weightbearing protocol.

Operative approach

Lateral transfibular approach. Fibular osteotomy and retraction. Preparation of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints down to bleeding subchondral bone. Intraoperative cultures sent as a precaution. Structural allograft packed into the void between the distal tibia and the residual talar body. Retrograde nail inserted through a plantar stab incision, with static proximal and distal interlocks and a posterior-to-anterior calcaneal interlock for rotational stability.

Fibula replaced over the construct as a lateral onlay graft with screw fixation for additional structural support.

Outcomes

Non-weightbearing for twelve weeks in a short-leg cast, then boot with partial weightbearing for another four weeks, then custom diabetic footwear with a rocker sole at four to five months. No wound complication. Cultures negative. At six months he was walking in his custom shoes, had returned to modified-duty work, and imaging showed consolidation without hardware failure. At one year the fusion was solid and he had resumed full work duties.

References

The Charcot reconstruction literature on superconstruct principles, particularly the Sammarco and Pinzur work, remains foundational. More recent comparative series on retrograde nail versus plate constructs are the primary references for implant choice.

Clinical Pearls05 Outcome · 05 Notes

Clinical pearls

  1. Rule out active infection before any reconstruction. Labs, imaging, and when in doubt, biopsy. Operating through an active neuropathic infection is a surgical catastrophe.

  2. Optimize the medical side first. A1c under 8 if you can, smoking cessation, nutritional status, vascular status. The operation is the last step, not the first.

  3. The superconstruct principles apply. Fuse beyond the zone of injury, use the strongest fixation you have, maximize bone-to-bone contact, and position implants to minimize soft-tissue compromise.

  4. Retrograde TTC nails are the workhorse for hindfoot Charcot. Adjunct medial column beams or plates are added when the midfoot is also unstable.

  5. Weightbearing protocol in Charcot is longer than in non-neuropathic fusions. Twelve to sixteen weeks non-weightbearing is not unusual, and they need a frame or a CROW boot during the transition.

Discussed on the PodcastCross-Reference

This case discussion is offered for educational and informational discussion among clinicians. It is not medical advice, does not establish a doctor-patient relationship, and is not a substitute for individualized clinical judgment, formal consultation, or institutional policy. Opinions expressed are conversational and do not represent a formal standard of care. Patient cases are de-identified; any resemblance to an identifiable patient is unintentional. Guests speak for themselves and not for Dr. Kadakia or The Ankl Man Podcast. See our full Terms and Legal Notice and Disclosures for details.